User talk:Reda benkhadra

Welcome!

Hello, Reda benkhadra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 13:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting in touch with you, asap!

Hello Reda,

My name is Oussama, a student from Salé/Rabat, I would like to know as you are the creator of the MA User Group, if they are any preparations or plans to host a Wikipedia 15 event? Also, I am part of a non-gov association that just started, and there is an incertitude about hosting a small event related to that? what do you think is possible?

Thank you in advance! OussDB (talk) 02:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @OussDB:

Thank you for your interest to the group.

Yes, we thought about organizing an event to celebrate the 15th anniversary of Wikipedia, but we have not decided which one.

However, the organization of the event by the NGOs you represent seems interesting.

Can you tell me more about your event to see how can we help you?

Cordially --Reda benkhadra (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning @Reda benkhadra:

Well, we just started internal discussion about it, we're so low on budget, so we also consider the minimum of costs to host.

The idea that i had in mind was to organise a school day in the local college/high school including mini-conferences, an edit-a-thon, and various talk by actual members, we rely on social media for external participation but, As an association, we try the max to work around the neighbourhood for the moment.

The second idea included the same concept, but with a wider audience, more like, changing the place to M5 University, or some other hosting spaces (Salle Allal Lfassi to cite an example) but we rely on personal finance for now, and we can't do such big things.

Thank you for your interest, and hope we can stay in touch! Here is our NGO page and my personal profile.

Have a good day!

OussDB (talk) 11:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latifa Echakhch

Reda, I'm glad you got the article up here, but please be more careful in your edits. You keep inserting unverified, promotional, non-neutral material--this is not the way to improve an article, and I keep having to remove the same material. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, particularly Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Translating_from_other_language_Wikimedia_projects. Another user has already applied a template to the talk page, but attribution needs to be given. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Najia Mehadji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Najia Mehadji

Thanks for adding this article to the English Wikipedia. I must say it looked very much like a raw machine translation. I have done a bit of copy editing on the biography section but the whole article needs a lot more work. If you want to draw on articles from other languages, please only include passages which you have had time to revise and bring up to a reasonable standard. A short, well written article with the essentials is far better than a long article with all the nonsense produced by Google translate. I hope you continue to contribute to the EN Wikipedia but please try to go for higher quality. Let me know if ever you need further assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for helping us to fix the gender gap

A barnstar for your contributions

55 new articles were created including Latifa Echakhch (assisted by Drmies} & Najia Mehadji (assisted by Ipigott) & Leila Ghandi.

It wasn't a competition but if it was then Big Iron won it.

MENA Women Artists worldwide online edit-a-thon

Host: Women in Red

May 2016

Starting now: Women in Entertainment and Women in Jewish History

--Victuallers (talk) 22:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Thank you @Victuallers: for the barnstar ! I also create an article about Leila Ghandi who is photographer

--Reda benkhadra (talk) 23:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Abdenasser El Khayati, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania '17 Scholarship Decision - Urgent

Hello Reda - I am trying to get in touch with you in order to inform you of your scholarship status. Please check your email and respond, ASAP. ITait (WMF) (talk) 22:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Reda benkhadra. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2026 Bidding Nation

  Hello, I am here to discuss the issue with the recent edits you have made in the pages of Morocco 2026 and United 2026.
  I would like to say that although the pages may be protected from vandalism, it would be of good use to eliminate opinions and sources that are not reliable.
   I am not asking you to stop but instead look at the source before removing or adding content to the pages.
    Thank You J1577 (talk) 01:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@J1577: Thank you for your message. I think you're referring to the edit that you just canceled here; know that a government support has nothing to do with the support that must come from the football federation - because it votes at the FIFA Congress - which is not the case for Saudi Arabia. Cordially, --Reda benkhadra (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   The issue with the edit in Saudi Arabia is that the support came Frome their government and NOT the official Football Federation. 
    I would like to state that Qatar also announced it's support to Morocco via their government and was not deleted from the page.
    My only request is for you not to express opinions or bias on these pages even if they do not seem positive through your point of view.
    Thank You for responding and I hope to see you exppress Morocco in more important and cultural pages. I look forward to reading about them!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by J1577 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@J1577: Hello again,

Having seen your editing comment here, I won't change it, but you the obligation following your logic to revert your edit here on the Moroccan page

--Reda benkhadra (talk) 03:29, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   Although you had a source for Angola, it was not reliable and I chose to leave it in the end to avoid conflict. Some of the other countries, however, did not have any sources and we're removed. Thank You again for your time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by J1577 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@J1577: I'm talking about your removing of Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia (here) for the same reason as the case of Saudi Arabia --Reda benkhadra (talk) 03:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 The removal was unintentional. The reason as to why I removed it was because it was uploaded with other countries that did confirm support.
   I apologise and ask you to understand that not all countries announce support through their respective FA. The vote is today and edits will not be available for either of the pages for the bids until after the final decision.
   Thank you for the talk and I hope you continue your editing and collaborations to Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by J1577 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been warned so I won't pile-on, but do stop making a mess. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: Why the same add here has not been reported for the same reasons! Please undo your modification --Reda benkhadra (talk) 12:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean about reporting, but I'm not watching that article, so I can't comment on what's happening there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: In this case, you need to know what has been discussed here before you allow yourself this kind of removal without any reason --Reda benkhadra (talk) 15:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that link. Keep your edit wars to one location and don't let them spread to other articles. WP:BRD applies everywhere. If you're going to edit without explaining why or pointing to alternate discussions, then you're digging your own grave. Also, don't ping me any longer. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: The outcome of that discussion was the necessity to create a section "Concerns, criticism & controversies" on Canada–Mexico–United States 2026 FIFA World Cup bid, thing I did. Thank you for your understanding, and please revert your edit. --Reda benkhadra (talk) 15:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've already established several things:

That article is not on my watch list.
The edit warriors (yourself included) did not point to that location during edits.

I will also add,

Your edit summaries were less than helpful or descriptive.
There was absolutely no discussion on the talk page of the article in question.

I am assuming good faith here, but it doesn't seem that you did a good job in explaining anything. There will be no reverting of my edit because there is no consensus on that article's talk page to do so, and the article is now fully locked thanks to your edit warring. Even if I had the will to make the change, I couldn't.

You also did not respect my wished to not be pinged here. I'm going to write this one final time: do not ping me again. I am not watching this talk page either so don't expect a response from here here. If you want to discuss this, take it to the talk page of the article you were edit warring on. I'm not interested in you attempting to justify your poor behaviour in this little corner of the project any longer. Going forward, the best you will get from me here is a link to an article or policy page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Reda benkhadra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Ghiretti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alessandro Ghiretti, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2019 F3 Asian Championship, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Corvus tristis (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling for the 2019 Tunisian presidential election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Opinion polling for the 2019 Tunisian presidential election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opinion polling for the 2019 Tunisian presidential election has been accepted

Opinion polling for the 2019 Tunisian presidential election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 12:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alessandro Ghiretti concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alessandro Ghiretti, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alessandro Ghiretti

Hello, Reda benkhadra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alessandro Ghiretti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure and noticeboard discussions

Hi Reda, and thanks for your contributions. FYI, the CfACP project is currently the subject of two discussions:

Administrators Noticeboard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Paid_editing_at_CfACP
WikiProject climate change: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Climate_change#Code_for_Africa_Climate_Change_Project

As you are a WiR for this project, I hope you will engage in these discussions so that the project can go more smoothly and productively.

Also, I understand that as a WiR, you are receiving a stipend. Please read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and comply as soon as possible. The policy requires that you state which organization is paying you, e.g. Code for Africa. You do not have to mention all the partners involved in the project, just the one organization that actually pays you. Best, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 20:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Suleiman Zanfari

Hello, Reda benkhadra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suleiman Zanfari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental effects of rail moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Environmental effects of rail, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sociological aspects of climate change moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sociological aspects of climate change, is not suitable as written to remain published. It reads like a personal essay, and needs to be re-written so that it simply reports in a third-party way, without commentary or conclusions. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Environmental effects of rail

Hello, Reda benkhadra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Environmental effects of rail, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	1908 Port Elizabeth flood is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Environmental effects of rail

Hello, Reda benkhadra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Environmental effects of rail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sociological aspects of climate change

Hello, Reda benkhadra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sociological aspects of climate change, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mulay (title) has been accepted

Mulay (title), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 18:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: El Mostafa Rezrazi (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:El Mostafa Rezrazi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]